Relocation Paradox
The relocation paradox came about from people's inability to stay in any one spot for an extended period of time: individuals would usually follow a process that consisted of taking up residence in one area for a short bit but then insisting on moving to another area for some other amount of time, then deciding to go somewhere else entirely for a short span, after that maybe return to the first spot, soon realize why they left the first spot and go elsewhere, and finally become so exhausted from moving that they'd drop dead.
The friends of such people, who were the real sufferers because they'd be forced to constantly cart stuff from one side of the globe to the other, finally became so frustrated that they proposed the relocation paradox in the hope that people would just stay the hell in one locale.
Thus, the paradox reads:
When attempting to travel from point A to point B, you must traverse all the points connecting them; however, a point, being an object of zero size, doesn't actually exist—so therefore you can't actually be at any of those points and thus can not travel from point A to point B. Furthermore, since point A and point B are objects of zero size themselves, they don't exist either and so no one can be at them.
Hence the universe, consisting of various points A and B, does not exist. Since there is no universe to exist in, nothing inside must exist, and so no relocating can take place because there is nothing to move nor any one to do the moving.
Information Entered On: 2005-11-13